[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Emf libray
From:       jaham () gmx ! net
Date:       2009-10-27 18:53:35
Message-ID: 200910271953.35631.jaham () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 26 October 2009 11:38:25 Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Sunday 25 October 2009 13:49:43 Inge Wallin wrote:
> > Ok, where to start this...
> >
> > Yesterday, I committed a library called qemf to koffice/libs, which reads
> >  and handles MS Extended MetaFiles.
> >
> > Today there was an email from Thomas and some discussion on IRC.  It's
> > not often that we have a new library, so there is no written rules about
> > how to do it.  It was agreed that the library stays in, and we have a
> > discussion here on the ML.
> >
> > There are 3 questions:
> > 1. Does this library belong in KOffice?
> > 2. Should the name be koemf instead of qemf?
> > 3. What is the right place for it.
> 
> A lot has been said about this, and I think it's time to wrap up.  Is
>  anybody unhappy with the following summary?
> 
> 1. mostly yes, at least it is ok.
> 2. qemf is perhaps not such a good name.  koemf is better, or even libemf.
> 3. For now, let's keep it out of libs/ and put it under the shape that uses
>  it instead.  It can always be moved if there are more users.
> 
> Regarding the shape, we all agree that a general vector shape is better,
>  but a good enough start is a dedicated EMF shape. It can be generalized
>  later.
> 
> Ok?

I am very ok with that.

Ciao Jan
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]