[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: koffice/libs/flake/tests
From:       Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date:       2009-09-25 7:42:32
Message-ID: 200909250942.32534.zander () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Friday 25. September 2009 06.18.33 Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> - it will no longer be possible to have something like the following:
>   layer 1: shape 1, shape 2
>   layer 2: shape 3, shape 4
>   and the following order:
>   shape 1
>   shape 3
>   shape 2
>   shape 4
>   which is possible right now and also allowed by the odf spec.

What does that mean, allowed by the odf spec?

I think its essential to have shapes keep in their layers and not have a 
shape shown on top of a shape in a layer above. I had the impression that 
this is a universal usage and design concept of layers.
Do you agree with that?

So, I'd support fixing the painting order to respect the shape hierarchy.

The algoritm Jan described sounds a bit complex; I have the impression it 
can be fixed by just making the sorting method take the parent into account. 
If you don't see what I have in mind, I can make a mockup of my idea later.
-- 
Thomas Zander

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]