[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: koffice mission statement etc.
From: Andrew Dorrell <andrew.dorrell () gmail ! com>
Date: 2009-08-31 12:57:37
Message-ID: 200908312257.37431.andrew.dorrell () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi Jos,
You make some very good points - especially about adding specifics. My list
was simply a first take at a bunch of alternatives just to get people thinking
(so you have to forgive the repetition - you are not meant to use all of
them). I would really like the koffice community to discuss, identify and
state what they want to achieve through their work on koffice. This may
include why koffice is important and distinct from other office software
projects.
I don't believe I've been around this project long enough to say! Personally
however I'd be cautious about setting as a mission something as mundane
sounding as
"To produce a collection of software tools for the creating,viewing and
editing office documents."
The reason is simple - it doesn't give any reason for the project to exist
over and above projects like open office (and others).
Perhaps:
"To provide the best free and open source suite of office and creativity
applications based around open standards and employing an efficient and
reliable set of components that provide a consistent feel to the creation of
specific content types across the suite."
One the other hand I don't have a problem with "To create a compelling suite
of office and creative applications that people will want to use."
For reference you might want to consider the svn mission
"to replace cvs"
and the XFree86 mission:
"The primary goal of the XFree86 Project is to produce XFree86® and to make
it the best freely-redistributable Open Source implementation of the X Window
System by implementing it on as many hardware and software platforms as
possible, by enhancing and extending it to meet the needs of new hardware and
software platforms and by licensing it in a manner that is the same as or
equivalent in spirit to the original MIT/X licence. The Project seeks to work
towards this goal in a manner that gives the strongest weight to the technical
integrity of the ideas, implementation, and individuals involved, with the
commercial viability and influences from commercial or political interests
being non-goals and explicitly not addressed."
which cover the range from short and sweet to comprehensive.
On Monday 31 August 2009 5:22:22 pm Jos van den Oever wrote:>
> This is a good initiative. I agree with you that it would be good to make a
> description of what we want people to be able to do with KOffice.
> If such a list is accurate it can be used to determine the development
> direction in a way that is more concise than just coding. Nevertheless, I
> think your list is a bit 'managerese' in the sense that it is not very
> concrete. For each of the points we state is goals it should be possible to
> say: 'have we achieved this goal?' without much effort. In this area you
> list comes short at the moment.
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic