From koffice-devel Wed Jun 17 18:42:51 2009 From: Boudewijn Rempt Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:42:51 +0000 To: koffice-devel Subject: Re: koffice/libs/flake [POSSIBLY UNSAFE] Message-Id: <200906172042.51570.boud () valdyas ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=124526415120636 On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > On Wed June 17 2009, you wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > > Note: I moved KoRTree from KoMain to flake, since it was used by > > > > flake and kspread, and kspread uses flake anyway. > > > > > > maybe KoRTree can be moved to a place where it is easier for other apps > > > (outside of koffice) to use. As far as I remember it should not have > > > any dependencies into other parts of koffice. > > > > I considered putting it in a lib all of its own :-). Then I considered > > KoBase, but that is depenedent on KoStore. I'm not sure what the right > > solution is, but I'm open to any hints. > > how about removing the only dependency on KoStore which is > > void KoUnit::saveOdf(KoXmlWriter* settingsWriter, KoUnit _unit) > { > settingsWriter->addConfigItem("unit", unitName(_unit)); > } > > if I'm not mistaken. We could move this function to a helper function into > koodf. If we can remove this dependency KoBase is no longer dependent on > kostore and it is easy to move stuff like KoRTree into it. Good plan! Can you commit the change? -- Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org _______________________________________________ koffice-devel mailing list koffice-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel