From koffice-devel  Sun May 31 21:53:37 2009
From: Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 21:53:37 +0000
To: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: Review Request: Improve the toolbox layout
Message-Id: <200905312353.42894.zander () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=124386180527141
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============2091083531=="

--===============2091083531==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart2378756.lA6AORtmZg";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart2378756.lA6AORtmZg
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 31. May 2009 14.59.44 Peter Simonsson wrote:
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/782/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Review request for KOffice.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> Two parts to this diff:
> * Simplify the layout algo for the toolbox. The current approach just
> breaks to easily, so for example the default layout of kpresenter. The
> new algorithm uses a different orientation depending on where the toolbox
> is docked, this takes us to the second part of the diff... * Save the
> area the dockwidget is docked in to work around the fact that Qt always
> reports the default area on start up even if the dockwidget is saved in
> another area.

I am hesitant to change anything of the toolbox without at least having all=
=20
the application usecases written down.  I fear we'll get a new design that=
=20
one app will not like and then end up ping-ponging.

I'd like to see people continue the writing down of usecases on=20
http://wiki.koffice.org/index.php?title=3DLibs/Brainstorming/Toolbox
See mail thread here from 4 weeks ago.
And when we have those then we can design something that takes every apps=20
requirements into account.

Can app owners please edit the above page and give usecases or at least=20
extend the current complaints suggestions there with reasons ?

Thanks!
=2D-=20
Thomas Zander

--nextPart2378756.lA6AORtmZg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkoi/GIACgkQCojCW6H2z/So5gCg3E29qn2fwI7Pu48ypK69Lnzh
rJIAn3J+ujaWoJ1mi7mVUAn4cdw6cO/T
=Q0P5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2378756.lA6AORtmZg--

--===============2091083531==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

--===============2091083531==--