'Re: 2.0 or 2.0RC2 and when ?'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: 2.0 or 2.0RC2 and when ?
From:       Cyrille Berger <cberger () cberger ! net>
Date:       2009-04-24 9:01:34
Message-ID: 200904241101.35140.cberger () cberger ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


An other solution would be to reimplement QWidget::setVisible (which is 
virtual), and prevent anyone to make the toolbox not visible (might have 
unknown conscequences)

-- 
Cyrille Berger

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" \
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" \
content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; \
}</style></head><body style=" font-family:'DejaVu Sans'; font-size:9pt; \
font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">An other solution would be to reimplement \
QWidget::setVisible (which is virtual), and prevent anyone to make the toolbox not \
visible (might have unknown conscequences)<br> <p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>-- <br> Cyrille \
Berger</p></body></html>


_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]