[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: windows installer, too old?
From:       Jaroslaw Staniek <js () iidea ! pl>
Date:       2009-04-16 9:05:36
Message-ID: 56a746380904160205t37a6e205tcd5eb44cbe69ba61 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2009/4/16 Cyrille Berger <cberger@cberger.net>:
> On Wednesday 15 April 2009, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> BTW:
>> (#kde-windows, today:)
>>
>> <jstaniek> SaroEngels: hi! regarding the recent question of ThomasZ
>> about koffice 4 windows; do we have announced we're looking for
>> maintainer for the packages?
>> <jstaniek> or we dont need maintainers and just time?
>> <SaroEngels> well
>> <SaroEngels> a maintainer just for koffice would be cool
>> <SaroEngels> it is mainly a time issue
>> <SaroEngels> someone who would be willing to compile koffice often
>> enough and fix the build etc.
>> <jstaniek> SaroEngels: as you imagine I would be motivated to
>> maintain kexi package at least
>> <jstaniek> SaroEngels: but for this, we need a split
>> <jstaniek> to kofficelibs and N*apps
> Then why does kexi wants to be part of koffice ?

Not 'wants'. It is.

But I won't maintain Krita package for you, that's what I say. I can't
even get it compile reasonably.

I also guess you agree that splitting one mega koffice package into
parts is a reasonable step.

-- 
regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]