[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: ODF Lists
From:       Sebastian Sauer <mail () dipe ! org>
Date:       2008-07-29 21:28:55
Message-ID: 200807292328.55650.mail () dipe ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 28 July 2008, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> I agree, headers don't need to be put in lists. Our current code is,
> hence, even more wrong than we discussed :). For some reason, I assumed
> that a header is always numbered.

[QUOTE]
Suppress Header Numbering
It is sometimes desired to have a specific heading which should not be 
numbered. This corresponds to unnumbered list headers in lists (see sections 
4.3). To facilitate this, an optional attribute text:is-list-header can be 
used. If true, the given header will not be numbered, even if an explicit 
list-style is given.
[/QUOTE]

So, even if it is within a list, it does not need to be numbered. So, a list 
(or liststyle) has nothing do to with numbers displayed in front of it. It 
even get more explicit if someone reads the MSOOXML-specs where that split 
between *presentation layer* and *internal representation* is even more clear 
and required.
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]