[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Notes on koffice unit tests
From:       Brad Hards <bradh () frogmouth ! net>
Date:       2007-02-11 7:22:07
Message-ID: 200702111822.15429.bradh () frogmouth ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Sunday 11 February 2007 17:56, Ariya Hidayat wrote:
> > 10, 36 and 38 may have something wrong with the test setup - dies in
> > QCoreApplication. Or maybe it is in my setup?
>
> Does this happen if you change the test (temporarily) to use
> KApplication directly? This is what I have to do for KSpread, at least
> until the issue is finally solved in kdelibs.
I've now corrected this problem (and also switched KSpread to use 
QTEST_KDEMAIN()). Let me know if this causes any new problems.

> > 23 is failing for some reason I don't understand - kspread formula parser
> > looks to be at fault.
>
> I'll have a look at this, if Stefan is not faster than me....
Thanks - would be appreciated.

> > 28 and 29 appear to be failing because of excess precision in the
> > comparison of floating point numbers.
>
> Will have a look as well.
Thanks again.

Brad

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]