On Friday 09 June 2006 23:26, Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Friday 9 June 2006 22:41, David Faure wrote:
> > > With this we cut out the kparts class.
> >
> > No no. Argh. This makes no sense ;)
> > All this over a confusing namespace? ;)
> > What matters is what's in the link line of your plugins, not the name
> > of the loading method.
> 
> Namespace? Link line?  No idea what thats all about.
You saying "we cut out the kparts class", which makes no sense since 
- there is no kparts class
- kparts is a namespace
- using the template methods from kparts::componentfactory doesn't actually require linking to kparts

> Hmm, I'll immediately admit I don't understand this loading stuff, it 
> would be great if there actually was some API docs :-)

Where do you miss api docs (in kdelibs trunk)? AFAICS all loading-related methods
are now documented.

-- 
David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel