[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: playground/office/flake
From:       Martin Ellis <m.a.ellis () ncl ! ac ! uk>
Date:       2006-05-01 18:15:40
Message-ID: 200605011915.40484.m.a.ellis () ncl ! ac ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 01 May 2006 18:58, Thomas Zander wrote:
> Not sure how the exporting of symbols in C++ or loadable libraries
> works, though. So I may be wrong with that.
>
> Can someone else comment on that?  Is it a good idea to name
> non-exportable local classes to a name without "Ko" ?

I might be wrong, but even if it's not exported by default, I'm not 
sure you can rely on everyone's build toolchain supporting 
visibility.

It's only recently been introduced in g++, right?

In that case, I think the class name would be visible outside the 
library, and either a prefix or a namespace would be appropriate.

Martin
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]