[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: KOffice as sponsoring organization for SOC 2006
From:       Inge Wallin <inge () lysator ! liu ! se>
Date:       2006-04-14 21:17:03
Message-ID: 200604142317.03439.inge () lysator ! liu ! se
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 14 April 2006 23.11, Thomas Zander wrote:
> I think you should do this via the e.v. Like we did last year.
> It may even have been a good idea to decide that earlier, so as to make
> sure only one KDE party contacted google and not confuse them too much.
> But, oh well.

We want KOffice to be our own entity.  Remember last year when the Gnome 
people had lots of subprojects of much lesser weight than KOffice as their 
own "organizations".  They got much more sponsoring than they would if they 
had just registered "Gnome".

	-Inge

> On Friday 14 April 2006 22:42, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > A third alternative would be to use the KDE e.V, the organization
> > holding the KDE trademark, as the formal organization, but I have not
> > checked with them yet to know if they would take the responsibility.
> > Please let me know your decision and what you prefer.

-- 
Inge Wallin               | Thus spake the master programmer:               |
                          |      "After three days without programming,     |
inge@lysator.liu.se       |       life becomes meaningless."                |
                          | Geoffrey James: The Tao of Programming.         |
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]