[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Grouping of applications in Koffice
From:       Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date:       2005-12-19 22:11:12
Message-ID: 200512192311.13093.zander () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Wednesday 14 December 2005 13:02, Martin Ellis wrote:
> > Still, Kexi does not belong in the first category for reasons I
> > posted in my previous mails.
>
> I think the only reason I saw you post was that users didn't expect a
> database app to be part of an Office suite, and that most people didn't
> use it.

Maybe you read to much into the text I wrote; for reference, here it is;
> > I agree this makes a lot more sense,  if only because kexi being a
> > "Productivity Application" does not fit with general perception of
> > what an Office Suite is.

> That didn't seem to hold much water for me, given the number of people
> who want(ed) "Access for Linux".   The reasoning seemed subjective at
> best.

Actually, its a well known fact that most people do not view an office 
suite as being more then the default 3 apps.

> If there was more to your argument, I guess I must have missed it.
Possible.  

Might be a nice time to make you aware of http://lists.kde.org

-- 
Thomas Zander

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]