[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: Mysql as Fedora Core RPM dependency
From: Martin Ellis <martin.ellis () kdemail ! net>
Date: 2005-08-20 16:53:50
Message-ID: 200508201753.51160.martin.ellis () kdemail ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi Mike,
On Friday 19 Aug 2005 23:03, mike@perusion.org wrote:
> I wanted to let whoever is running the Fedora RPM distro for koffice
> know that the recent update caused problems for us because of a (new?)
> dependency with mysql. It is requiring a specific MySQL client version
> as a hard dependency.
I guess packages for all distributions that contain the Kexi MySQL driver will
have to require a specific MySQL client version. But Kexi itself (and hence
KOffice), shouldn't depend on that package.
(For example, in Debian, the Kexi package 'recommends' the MySQL driver --
nothing more.)
As far as I understand, packagers have to link against something, and if they
compile against a particular .so version, the only way to make it work with a
different '.so' version is to recompile.
> In my opinion, setting a specific version of a database server for an
> office software package is wrong. It should not matter precisely
> what version; if it does, then you have distributed a bad release.
IIRC, the Kexi MySQL driver should compile against the everything going back
to the 3.2something LGPL driver, through version 4 (which is what I test with
now), and right up to version 5 (although I've not tested that).
> I realize that that person may not reside on this list, and I also
> realize that no one here may care much. 8-)
Hey, at least the compiler shipped by Fedora can compile Kexi now! :o)
Seriously, though. As far as I know, most distributions allow different .so
versions of the same library to be installed (heck, even Gentoo does) - I
guess you might be able to do this in Fedora?
> But I thought I would at least let the powers that be know that
> it has impacted our systems -- we won't install koffice by default
> in the next kickstart if this dependency problem continues....
That's up to you, I guess. But having exactly no influence on the way Fedora
packages Kexi, I don't think I can exactly claim to be one of the "powers
that be."
I did write the best part of this wiki page though, which describes how we
recommend packagers package Kexi.
http://www.kexi-project.org/wiki/wikiview/index.php?HintsForMakingKexiPackages
Perhaps it's worth pointing the FC packagers there.
Cheers
Martin
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic