On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:00:28 +0100, Martin Ellis <kde@martinellis.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Friday 11 March 2005 18:34, Martin Ellis wrote:
> > > Alternatively, I wonder if there'll be a kdeplayground-koffice?
> 
> > Having everything inside koffice makes it easier to keep an eye on "who's
> > using this koffice lib method", or porting apps to koffice libs changes,
> > etc. It also makes it easier for people to help with those alpha-quality
> > apps, I think (only one module to compile from sources).
> 
> Oh.  People seem to get fairly grumpy when stuff in CVS doesn't compile, so
> 
> I'd be reluctant to try the feature we discussed in the "KSpread DB import"
> 
> thread in koffice svn.  Having somewhere where things are allowed to break 
> now and again would be nice.
> 


Why not use your own branch for KSpread?
As I understand it, in subversion it's very easy to do, and
afterwards, merge your branch with head/trunk ?
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel