From koffice-devel  Sun Jan 30 20:47:01 2005
From: Raphael Langerhorst <raphael-langerhorst () gmx ! at>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:47:01 +0000
To: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: Fwd: Look at Style for KOffice logo
Message-Id: <200501302147.02284.raphael-langerhorst () gmx ! at>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=110711814425438

On Sunday 30 January 2005 20:02, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Sunday 30 January 2005 19:58, David Faure wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 January 2005 11:49, Raphael Langerhorst wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have attached only the 128x128 icon. Do you all think this
> > > style is ok?
> > >
> > > Questions:
> > >
> > > 1) Style OK?
> > > my opinion: yes
> >
> > Yes but the overall icon is only a K on a gear - which means KDE,
> > not KOffice, doesn't it? I'm afraid it lacks a koffice-specific
> > something.
> >
> > The problem is that "KO" wouldn't look good :-))
>
> That suggests a big boxing glove :-)
>
> > IMHO it would be good to keep the current
> > kword/kpresenter/kspread icons at least (*). They look consistent
> > to me, and they are indeed known by all users. My suggestion
> > would be that new icons are made only for the other apps, with
> > the same look. Just my 2 cents.
>
> Those are the three 'gem-like' icons that look as if they were part
> of a series.

I agree on that. I must admit that I got very used to these icons. In 
particular I also agree with David that KChart fits quite well into 
this, too. Andrey, what do you think about these icons? Do you like 
their style? You think you can create the rest of the icons 
consistent to these? Or do you prefer creating a complete new set? 
[that should be good of course, to replace commonly known icons].

Regards,
Raphael
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel