From koffice-devel  Wed Oct 27 06:59:42 2004
From: zander () kde ! org
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 06:59:42 +0000
To: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: State of KPlato?
Message-Id: <20041027065942.GA26932 () factotummedia ! nl>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=109886042523706
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============0751965590=="


--===============0751965590==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf"
Content-Disposition: inline


--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


You are very welcome to extend it.  It mostly just needs work being done
IIRC.

Also:
http://lists.kde.org/?l=3Dkoffice-devel&m=3D108239256114421&w=3D2

On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 09:54:03PM +0200, Raphael Langerhorst wrote:
> Hi all,
>=20
> What is the current state of KPlato? Is it desired to improve it? ....=20
> Hmm.. just skimmed through the KPlato docs... it seems some people=20
> have already thought about what should be implemented, how far is it?
>=20
> And what about ... for example Mr. Project?

--=20
Thomas Zander

--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBf0deCojCW6H2z/QRAsH9AKCz2ni6tAYEBTdFbozTax7xwXW7mgCgshyL
GmYhaSDbIAM3AOJfM2rZViU=
=W/ZF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf--

--===============0751965590==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

--===============0751965590==--