[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Krita features
From:       Boudewijn Rempt <boud () calcifer ! valdyas ! org>
Date:       2004-01-14 13:58:51
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.53.0401141455130.23261 () calcifer ! valdyas ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 dirk.schoenberger@sz-online.de wrote:

> What about KPainter then? (kdenonbeta/kapinter)
> More complex rendering model, but unfortunately rather neglected in the
> last time due to being not used in applications ;)

I wouldn't know. Once I decided that Krita was going to
be the best jumpstart for the kind of app I wanted to
make, I went to work on Krita. I mean, Krita has been
through at least three redesigns of its core -- I figured
it didn't need another heart transplant.

For the record: the other options I looked at and rejected were:

* Build a shell around the gimp
* Build a shell around ImageMagick
* Build a shell around KPainter
* Build a shell around QPainter
* Do everything myself
* Reanimate Paintworks

>
> What rendering model would be needed for an image editor?
>

Krita's is perfectly fine.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]