From koffice-devel  Mon Dec 29 21:33:56 2003
From: Nicolas Goutte <nicolasg () snafu ! de>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:33:56 +0000
To: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: KOFFICE_1_3_BRANCH: koffice/filters/kontour
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=107273369601826

On Monday 29 December 2003 12:58, Thomas Zander wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 29 December 2003 11:28, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> > > untagging is 'cvs tag -d TAGNAME FILENAME'
> >
> > The CVS info page tells that you cannot delete a branch tag this way.
> > However you can force it with -B (with caution warnings in the doc).
> >
> > On the other side, the doc about cvs remove *does* tell that it only
> > deletes "on the branch which you are working on".
>
> The point is not that the command got the desired effect; the point is that
> the files should never have been in the branch and therefor the removal of
> the branch is the right thing to do.
>
> Why:
> if I update to 25-dec (cvs up -D "25 dec 2003") I get those files back.
> That is undesirable.
> If I join the branches (cvs up -j BRANCHNAME) the effect is also not quite
> what I want.
>
> But as I said in my initial email; _next_ time, so lets not discuss cvs
> stuff here :-)

CVS is about keeping history. Those files were branched, distributed as RC2 
and so on. So why do you want to delete history?

>
> - --
> Thomas Zander

Have a nice day!

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE/8BbUCojCW6H2z/QRApgcAKCK7zz2g2zpoP0PRmhNqt9SRSTgCQCfQyof
> LPhp4rXJa/Na40Dbl8cjX8A=
> =jCTp
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> koffice-devel mailing list
> koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel