[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: KOFFICE_1_3_BRANCH: koffice/filters/kontour
From:       Thomas Zander <TZander () FactotumMedia ! nl>
Date:       2003-12-29 11:58:09
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 29 December 2003 11:28, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> > untagging is 'cvs tag -d TAGNAME FILENAME'
>
> The CVS info page tells that you cannot delete a branch tag this way.
> However you can force it with -B (with caution warnings in the doc).
>
> On the other side, the doc about cvs remove *does* tell that it only
> deletes "on the branch which you are working on".

The point is not that the command got the desired effect; the point is that 
the files should never have been in the branch and therefor the removal of 
the branch is the right thing to do.

Why:
if I update to 25-dec (cvs up -D "25 dec 2003") I get those files back. That 
is undesirable.
If I join the branches (cvs up -j BRANCHNAME) the effect is also not quite 
what I want.

But as I said in my initial email; _next_ time, so lets not discuss cvs stuff 
here :-)

- -- 
Thomas Zander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/8BbUCojCW6H2z/QRApgcAKCK7zz2g2zpoP0PRmhNqt9SRSTgCQCfQyof
LPhp4rXJa/Na40Dbl8cjX8A=
=jCTp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]