From koffice-devel  Fri Oct 24 05:28:02 2003
From: Boudewijn Rempt <boud () valdyas ! org>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 05:28:02 +0000
To: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: KoColor && CMYK -> RGB
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=106697342121199
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============1972035068=="


--===============1972035068==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_ihLm/CNRMSMInRB";
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--Boundary-02=_ihLm/CNRMSMInRB
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 24 October 2003 00:50, Kevin Krammer wrote:

> Wouldn't it be better to either check if the pointers are !=3D 0 or use i=
nt&
> instead of int*?

Well, I would prefer not to change the function signature in an existing=20
class. Besides, it would rather stand out in a class that's pretty homogeno=
us=20
right now. And I guess I think, although I'm not qualified to judge, that=20
Harri's right, too.
=2D-=20
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org/index2.html

--Boundary-02=_ihLm/CNRMSMInRB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/mLhidaCcgCmN5d8RAlczAJ9ZED2K71kpvCUQMCuc/Ei7sB0WQgCg8PNK
8uUqMwMFJ8imOpx9/Slzhqg=
=C4P0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_ihLm/CNRMSMInRB--


--===============1972035068==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

--===============1972035068==--