> According to a discussion I had with Lenny a "Morph" is taken from the
> Smalltalk/Squeak class library 

It's inspired by, it has nothing to do with it.

(http://www.squeak.org). The name was taken
> because Ruby has not good name space support, and the name "Object" was
> already taken, and to general...

That's not true. ruby has good name space support.  
"Object" is the mother class of all classes. Of course you _could_
probably use an own class "Object" within a name space. It's in the same
way a good idea to call an own class QObject in a Qt/KDE project. You
are free to go on with such bright ideas.

Bye
Lenny
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel