It depend on what you see as minor and as major upgrades.

Personnaly for a KOffice 2.0, I am missing:
- control over Postscript output (we currently leave it to QT.)
- font replacement. (One user has not the same fonts as the other, but they 
might exchange documents. I also include here the bitmap font problem.)
- good import and export to/from MS Office.
- good import and export to/from OpenOffice.
- good import and export to/from HTML or at least to/from XHTML. (I suppose 
that import is limited to KWord.)
- good SVG support (not only in Karbon.)
- version control (especially in KWord.)

That are the major problems that I see for a version number 2.0. (I also see a 
few less major ones.)

So may be KOffice is getting better and better but it has still major 
challenges in front of it.

Have a nice day/evening/night!

On Tuesday 14 January 2003 00:17, Sarang Lakare wrote:
> Why is the version numbered 1.3 and not 2.0?
>
> I think the difference in functionality and time between the releases is
> too great and it should be 2.0.
>
> If we name it 1.3, then people might think that the upgrade is just a minor
> upgrade.
>
> Regards,
> Sarang

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel