[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: [Bug 51209] koffice requires libfl but configure doesn't check that
From:       Nicolas Goutte <nicog () snafu ! de>
Date:       2002-11-28 10:16:46
[Download RAW message or body]

There is also this information page in automake's info about using lex and 
yacc with automake: info:/automake/Yacc and Lex

Have a nice day/evening/night!

On Thursday 28 November 2002 10:12, Robert JACOLIN wrote:
> Le Mercredi 27 Novembre 2002 21:54, Nicolas Goutte a écrit :
> > While reading the info page of automake, I have found the solution.
> > ( info:/autoconf/Particular Programs )
> >
> > It is to automake to decide which library is needed whetver the flex one
> > or the lex one. ( AC_PROG_LEX )
> >
> > So the -lfl should be removed also from the KOFFICE_1_2_BRANCH, if it is
> > not done already. (Can anybody do it?)
> >
> > And now I also understand why KDEPIM using bison directly is bad. The
> > reason is that automake has a check for yacc too. ( AC_PROG_YACC ) So
> > perhaps the future Latex import filter should use yacc too for wider
> > compactibility, especially with non-GNU systems.
>
> Yes it (will) use(s) flex/yacc.
> _______________________________________________
> koffice-devel mailing list
> koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
> http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]