-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 19 July 2002 18:43, Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Friday 19 July 2002 18:36, David Faure wrote:
> > On Friday 19 July 2002 01:50, Mike McBride wrote:
> > > Notice to all who have developed for KWord:
> > >
> > > I am asking everyone to review the current list of KWord developers (the
> > > list was taken from the web pages) that will be included in the
> > > documentation, to see if any changes need to be made.
> > >
> > > The most current list is available at:
> > >
> > > http://docs.kde.org/HEAD/koffice/kword/credits.html
> 
> I think it looks strange that the copyright goes to one person. That one
> person also does not have the majority of the files in the source-tree
> anymore :)
I agree. In all theory, I'd say it doesn't really matter. But people see that name
first, and assume he's the maintainer, and send him bug reports ;)

> Is it a problem to say that the copyright is owned by all those people? IMNAL,
> so please just correct me if that poses a problem!
Many other apps have a copyright line like "the <appname> developers".
I think this would be best indeed. But to change the copyright we need the ok
from the current owner, i.e. asking Reggie before doing it.

- -- 
David FAURE, david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~david/
Contributing to: http://www.konqueror.org/, http://www.koffice.org/
On holidays from 20/07 to 24/07
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9OFDZ72KcVAmwbhARAgM5AKCgpmpRz3fVI65zqcQMj9iRrQoXCgCeO9CM
ld/da+8TjOwsA98xKfil1Bo=
=GvvX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel