From koffice-devel Wed Jul 17 21:11:43 2002 From: Thomas Zander Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:11:43 +0000 To: koffice-devel Subject: Re: [RFC] Adding a new filter status X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=102694087002268 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 17 July 2002 22:58, Nicolas Goutte wrote: > On Mittwoch, 17. Juli 2002 07:30, Thomas Zander wrote: > It is not me who take the status very seriously, it is some of our users. > For them "good", is not 50% but more like 90%. > Personnaly, I think that numbers would only be good if we had objective > criteria, like for example character formating max. 5 points, layout max.= 5 > points, inlined image max. 5 point, tables max. 10 points, styles max. 10 > points... But its not for you; its for the users. And like you say yourself, they ne= ed=20 it to make sense of the current termology. Its not suppost to be a numeral, as I said before. Its suppost to be a=20 graphical representation of a percentile number. The actual number is never= =20 shown. Hope you understand it now :) > We have not yet a status for the stable branch. I have tried to make one > yesterday, but I have only found out that WebCVS do not let you fetch the > lastest revision of a branch, if you do not know the revision number. :-( > (If someone knows how to do it with WebCVS, please tell!) http://webcvs.kde.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/koffice/kword/kwview.cc?rev=3DKOFF= ICE_1_2_BETA2&content-type=3Dtext/html Cheers! =2D --=20 Thomas Zander zander@planescape.c= om We are what we pretend to = be =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9Nd2SCojCW6H2z/QRAkiJAJsFW/pc5phfXjDPVVgcaReQPrhLDwCeMCp1 2zC5K+Rl2yX8q4cE74MRfiw=3D =3DkoiE =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ koffice-devel mailing list koffice-devel@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel