From koffice-devel Wed Jul 17 05:31:21 2002 From: Thomas Zander Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 05:31:21 +0000 To: koffice-devel Subject: Re: [RFC] Adding a new filter status X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=102688435007870 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--l76fUT7nc3MelDdI" --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 12:28:56PM +0700, Ariya Hidayat wrote: >=20 > > Personally, I fail to see how useful it will be for a user to have a ta= ble > > with many rows (features) and with many many columns (filters). >=20 > I'm thinking of one table for each filter (import and export together). > For example, one table can list KWord features which are supported under > HTML export and import at the same time. Allows versioning, e.g > WordPerfect 5 and 6/7/8 at different columns. Such table can be made > similar for a group of KWord filters, i.e items in the rows are similar, > but not necessary list all filters at once. >=20 > Beside, putting them in separate categories (character, paragraph, page > properties and so on) makes it easy for the developers to track features. > Or maybe for users who wonder which things are supported and which aren't. But that is what the status.html is for. --=20 Thomas Zander zander@planescape.c= om We are what we pretend to = be --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj01ASgACgkQCojCW6H2z/Sv5ACeIfA60yYRQpPmHfo9a44V+81+ FaAAoPYpvBOrWsqADJ+7EjyQX4eMeobP =SMVc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI-- _______________________________________________ koffice-devel mailing list koffice-devel@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel