From koffice-devel  Sat Jul 13 10:22:03 2002
From: Clarence Dang <dang () kde ! org>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 10:22:03 +0000
To: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: [RFC] Adding a new filter status
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice-devel&m=102655585530064

On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 08:05, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> I am wondering if we should not introduce a new filter status between
> "beta" and "good".
>
I think this is an excellent idea!

> The problem that I have found is that you need to have at least the status
> "beta" before users report bugs and that users consider that "good" means
> that everything should function perfectly. However all these make "beta"
> being very broad.
>
I'm thinking that it might also be a good idea to have a table of what "basic" 
features each filter imports/exports e.g. character formatting, paragraph 
formatting, page formatting (includes headers/footers/pagination), images etc 
so that if someone wants to help with kword filters, they have a better idea 
of what can be improved and users know what filters work best for their 
purposes (eg. I did not know that the HTML exporter could do images until 
yesterday when I used it).

> As for the name of the new status, I have "gamma" or "working". Perhaps
> someone could find a better name.
>
> The new status would indicate a filter whose maintainer thinks that,
> despite having holes, it should work good otherwise.
>
"working" sounds good to me.

Or renaming what is currently "good" to "excellent" and making the new 
category "good".

Thanks!
Clarence
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel