This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0E8EE.A267AB9C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yes, I hadn't thought of that ;-) >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David Faure [mailto:david@mandrakesoft.com] >> Sent: 30 May 2001 09:18 >> To: koffice@max.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de >> Subject: Re: KOffice release schedule updated >> >> >> On Wednesday 30 May 2001 11:14, Michael Ansley \(UK\) wrote: >> > Is the KOffice development team in the habit of creating a >> > maintenance branch? If so, at which point is 1.1 branched from >> > the HEAD? During the 1.1 freeze there are likely to be >> > developers working on new stuff that could still be integrated. >> > The >> only extra >> > work is that any patches must be applied to both the 1.1 >> branch, and >> > the HEAD. Of course, it may make sense to branch only after RC1 >> > is released, in order to minimise any double patching. >> >> Yes, we'll probably do that. After 1.1-final, I'd say. >> That's how we always >> did it in KDE itself as well. If you branch earlier, then >> you encourage people >> to work on new stuff instead of bugfixing things for the >> upcoming release ;-) >> >> -- >> David FAURE, david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org >> http://perso.mandrakesoft.com/~david/, http://www.konqueror.org/ >> KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBOxTDNnympNV/C086EQIS6QCfT6PFPfkevZWpzNzxFbQNyPJxHE0AniLL ihcDJ5IgOXuFXPXln/5tYd0L =0dzr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0E8EE.A267AB9C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: KOffice release schedule updated

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes, I hadn't thought of that ;-)

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Faure [mailto:david@mandrakesoft.com]
>> Sent: 30 May 2001 09:18
>> To: koffice@max.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de
>> Subject: Re: KOffice release schedule updated
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 30 May 2001 11:14, Michael Ansley = \(UK\) wrote:
>> > Is the KOffice development team in the hab= it of creating a
>> > maintenance branch?  If so, at which = point is 1.1 branched from
>> > the HEAD?  During the 1.1 freeze ther= e are likely to be
>> > developers working on new stuff that could= still be integrated.
>> > The
>> only extra
>> > work is that any patches must be applied t= o both the 1.1
>> branch, and
>> > the HEAD.  Of course, it may make sen= se to branch only after RC1
>> > is released, in order to minimise any doub= le patching.
>>
>> Yes, we'll probably do that. After 1.1-final, I= 'd say.
>> That's how we always
>> did it in KDE itself as well. If you branch ear= lier, then
>> you encourage people
>> to work on new stuff instead of bugfixing thing= s for the
>> upcoming release ;-)
>>
>> --
>> David FAURE, david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.= org
>> http://perso.mandrakesoft.com/~david/, http://www.konqueror.org/<= /FONT>
>> KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available T= oday
>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBOxTDNnympNV/C086EQIS6QCfT6PFPfkevZWpzNzxFbQNyPJxH= E0AniLL
ihcDJ5IgOXuFXPXln/5tYd0L
=3D0dzr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



_________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged= and/or copyright
material of Intec Telecom Systems PLC (or its affiliated companies). If yo= u are not an
intended or authorised recipient of this e-mail or have received it in erro= r, please delete
it immediately and notify the sender by e-mail. In such a case, reading, r= eproducing,
printing or further dissemination of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and= may be unlawful.
Intec Telecom Systems PLC. does not represent or warrant that an attachment= hereto is free
from computer viruses or other defects. The opinions expressed in this e-ma= il and any
attachments may be those of the author and are not necessarily those of Int= ec Telecom
Systems PLC.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
__________________________________________________________________________<= BR> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0E8EE.A267AB9C--