[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice
Subject:    Re: Update: status files
From:       shaheed <srhaque () iee ! org>
Date:       2001-01-12 21:47:41
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Enno,

> By the way I have updated the existing status files:
...
> Please commit - Thanks

Will do!

> That is I thing not a so good idear. Because we had thinked about this
> and thought it would be the best to add the status files in the
> directories
...
> Ofcourse we do have only a small number of filter developers at the
> moment
> but everyone who has done a cvs update can read AND  edit this files
> and  if somethink
> is missing he can add it a send it to the mailing list.
>
> When I document what a filter does I would write it directly there where
> the filter
> is - I don't have to change directories and it's at one place where I
> can always find
> it back.
> Of course if you do everything at the www space it is easier to maintain
> but thats
> not the goal what we wanted to reach.
> So please think about this.

As I hinted in my note, I completely agree with this idea. But, at the 
moment, I appear to be the only one doing commits for this stuff. and it 
would be a pain for me to do things the proper way (especially as it is not 
possible to verify the links via webcvs for hours). As soon as anyone else 
becomes active, I'd encourage them to have their status file moved to the 
right directory (a quick note to davidf seems to work for me!) and update the 
link in the index.html to point to the status file via webcvs.

Thanks, Shaheed

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]