From koffice  Wed Aug 04 11:54:00 1999
From: weis <weis () stud ! uni-frankfurt ! de>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 11:54:00 +0000
To: koffice
Subject: Re: STL or MiniSTL ?
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice&m=93376762404704

Hi,

My first porting try failed becuase I removed STl and koml
in one step. That was a mistake. We will make little
steps now.
But the first one will be to get rid of STL.

Bye
torben


On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Igor A. Shevchenco wrote:

> 
> Recently kom/openparts/koffice switched to using mico's mini-stl but
> kdelibs's configure fails for me saying that mico should be compiled with
> --disable-mini-stl (31.jul.1999 cvsup). Does KOM/OpenParts/KOffice
> switched to using 'normal' STL again ? If yes, why ? On my i586, 133 mhz
> w/ 64 mb ram kdelibs, konq and koffice compiles for ages when using
> 'normal' STL and alot faster with mini-stl. BTW, what parts of mico can
> be disabled so kom/etc will work ? (AFAIK, it works without COSS - maybe
> something else ? (I want to increase compile speed as much as possible)).
> 
> 	igor
> 
>