[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice
Subject:    Re: Back to work
From:       David Faure <faure () kde ! org>
Date:       1999-03-30 8:56:40
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 10:51:10AM +0200, Kai-Uwe Sattler wrote:
> David Faure wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 12:59:20PM +0200, Kai-Uwe Sattler wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm back now and I would like to continue the work on KIllustrator. But,
> > > now koffice requires a Qt 2.0, right ?
> > Yes.
> > Get a free CVS access to qt from TT web pages.
> > 
> > > Or is there a way to continue with 1.4x ?
> > No, unless you use outdated version of the libs, which is wrong IMHO.
> But it's a little bit annoying, because most of the users are not willing
> to install a beta qt as well as unstable KDE libs (at least I think so).

Yes, koffice doesn't have two branches like KDE has.
Do you really want to maintain two branches of killu ? ;)
We have to move on to Qt 2.0 anyway...

About users, I suggest we add a Qt snapshot to the directory were kdelibs &
koffice snapshots are. Yesterday's Qt (and problaby today's as well) worked 
fine.

-- 
David FAURE
david.faure@insa-lyon.fr, faure@kde.org
http://www.insa-lyon.fr/People/AEDI/dfaure/index.html 
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]