--===============0519188422==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart3580817.3Dn33QFnsU";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart3580817.3Dn33QFnsU
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Dne ponedeljek 21. januarja 2008 je Sebastian Sauer napisal(a):
> Anyway, the intention of that reply is only to outline that there are also
> drawbacks on such kind of actions and that LGPL would at least still allow
> non-GPL projects to profit from it too while still protecting the own wor=
k.
> Very useful for libraries like e.g. such a filter.

That is true. I haven't had much to do with LGPL yet so far, so I without=20
intent neglected it.

I agree that LGPL would be a better suited license for libraries.


Cheers,
Matija

=2D-=20
gsm: +386 41 849 552
e-mail: matija.suklje@rutka.net
www: http://matija.suklje.name

aim: hookofsilver
icq: 110183360
jabber/g-talk: matija.suklje@gabbler.org
msn: matija.suklje@rutka.net
yahoo: matija_suklje

--nextPart3580817.3Dn33QFnsU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHk/dMK2gLUQVJ0ngRAgbLAJ9yTfVs/1oBk0dsJyikYIkAWj1B4QCfbUUQ
s/3Xdvmx2f9qd9YNT8An+Ss=
=TlP8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart3580817.3Dn33QFnsU--

--===============0519188422==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice

--===============0519188422==--