--===============0892753853==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart9964415.AeaYQstVWS";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart9964415.AeaYQstVWS
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 03 December 2006 23:13, Benol wrote:

> If OO has it covered already, then why can't you use their code? Is it
> against LGPL? Don't get me wrong - I use KOffice as my main office suite,
> but am just curious.

The OO code is intimately coupled to their internal data represenations and=
=20
sometimes even to their gui. It would take just as much time as it would to=
=20
reverse engineer the file formats itself. Never underestimate the=20
gruesomeness of obfuscated C++!

=2D-=20
Boudewijn Rempt=20
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi

--nextPart9964415.AeaYQstVWS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFc02hdaCcgCmN5d8RAnM4AJ9a0cs1QFt/wdkJnSWTgj70YHNBdgCgwIj7
kK0c7PJ7RFqeRasWhAcwf58=
=BJCk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart9964415.AeaYQstVWS--


--===============0892753853==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice

--===============0892753853==--