[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice
Subject:    Re: KOffice Lies about requirements and then refuses to accept bug
From:       Clarence Dang <dang () kde ! org>
Date:       2006-11-19 9:06:06
Message-ID: 200611192006.08922.dang () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 10 November 2006 22:11, David Faure wrote:
> On Fri Nov 10 2006, Clarence Dang wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 20:31, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
> > > > Fair enough you guys made a mistake so what do I do after I've
> > > > downloaded 55 megs which at our excess rate would be $5.50 or so.
> > > > Then I go off and sign-up to the KDE bugzilla and try to submit a
> > > > report so you guys will correct your information and not mis-lead
> > > > people but it tells me more or less sorry your version is to old go
> > > > away. Great so I can't even follow your own bug request system.
> > >
> > > Please accept our apologies and we'll fix that so it won't happen
> > > again.
> >
> > You won't believe how many bugs I have _not_ reported because of:
> >
> > 1. Hassle of needing to login
> > 2. Not accepting any version other than the latest ones.
>
> You won't believe how annoying it is to get bugs reported for things that
> are already fixed in the latest version.
>
> Look at the numbers there: http://bugs.kde.org/weekly-bug-summary.cgi
> We need more fixing, not more outdated reports.

Sure, it's a tradeoff between unreported bugs and duplicate bugs.  I 
personally prefer the latter but not everyone agrees with me :)
____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]