[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: koffice
Subject: Re: libpqxx for Koffice's Kexi -- which version?
From: Jaroslaw Staniek <js () iidea ! pl>
Date: 2005-07-24 16:59:23
Message-ID: 42E3C93D.9060507 () iidea ! pl
[Download RAW message or body]
Benjamin Sher said the following, On 2005-07-01 00:57:
> I am trying to solve the last stage of the "make" phase, where, after 90
> minutes, Koffice stalled. I am told that this error message is due to
> the pqxx issue. So, I am trying my best to figure this out. Here is a
> list of my pqxx libraries:
>
> [sher@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa libpqxx
> libpqxx-2.2.3-1.2.el4.rf
> [sher@localhost ~]$ rpm -q |grep libpqxx
> rpmq: no arguments given for query
> [sher@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa |grep libpqxx
> libpqxx-2.2.3-1.2.el4.rf
> libpqxx-devel-2.2.3-1.2.el4.rf
>
>
> The question is: do I need an updated version of these libraries? If so,
> please see below:
>
>
> [sher@localhost ~]$ cd Downloads/Koffice
> [sher@localhost Koffice]$ ls
> koffice-1.4.0a libpqxx-2.5.4.tar.gz wv2-0.2.2
> koffice-1.4.0a.tar.bz2 libwpd-0.8.2 wv2-0.2.2.tar.bz2
> libpqxx-2.5.4 libwpd-0.8.2.tar.gz
> [sher@localhost Koffice]$
>
>
> What I would like to know is whether this is the issue? And if I should
> therefore replace the ealier version of libpqxx and libpqxx-devel by
> first "yum remove filename", then recompiling the later tarball version.
> Will that work? Is it OK to do this?
I am using version 2.3.x without problems on Linux. Anything newer should be
ok as well. What's exactly the error message?
--
regards / pozdrawiam,
Jaroslaw Staniek / OpenOffice Polska / Kexi Team
http://www.openoffice.com.pl | http://www.kexi-project.org
KDElibs/Windows: http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=KDElibs+for+win32
____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic