On Thu, May 27, 2004 11:12:59 AM +0200, David Faure (faure@kde.org) wrote:
> On Thursday 27 May 2004 10:48, Marco Fioretti wrote:
> > OOffice-wise, OASIS compatibility means that KOffice simply has to
> > integrate the StarBasic language, or whatever they call it today.
> > Or not?
> 
> At some point it also makes sense to reuse our own technologies
> instead of putting another man-year of efforts reimplementing a
> scripting language....
> 
> Integrating KJSEmbed sounds like we could provide scripting in
> koffice in a relatively short time frame. Redeveloping
> StarBasic... doesn't sounds like it.

Yes, no doubt that redoing StarBasic is a much bigger effort, I am
aware of that.

My question was more to figure out how much awareness there is about
this problem, if some developer already has plans to try it, and if
there is any standardization activity for this.

Ciao,
	Marco Fioretti

-- 
Marco Fioretti                 mfioretti, at the server mclink.it
Red Hat for low memory         http://www.rule-project.org/en/

[WYSIWYG] Word processing may be an obsolete idea of the 1980s...no
longer a necessity in the age of the Web and email
		                   Michael Stutz, The Linux Cookbook
____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@mail.kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice