From koffice Thu Jan 29 17:49:23 2004 From: "Eugene Nine" Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:49:23 +0000 To: koffice Subject: Re: users book about KOffice Message-Id: <200401290949.AA186253578 () ninefamily ! com> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice&m=107539712701425 Eugene Nine I thought somewhere back in one of the early post someone was volunteering :). I thought koffice 2 or whatever the next version is going to be was going to be soon from all the talk I was seeing so I didn't understand how a book could get published in time and was volunteering to help out on a book for the next release. Since the next release is far enough out that a book on it will be possible I can volunteer to help on on that. But after seeing my communication skills you may not wich to take me up on that offer :) ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Raphael Langerhorst Reply-To: For discussion about KOffice Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:33:38 +0100 >comments inline... > >On Thursday 29 January 2004 14:56, Eugene Nine wrote: >> So it sounds like a Koffice 2.0 is much further away than I thought. Which >> is god timing for someone who wishes to write a book, they can start on 1.3 >> and follow the changes/additions and just make the book match. > >That's quite the reason why I started the thread (in addition to the file >format change to OOo which should be finished with the next major release ... >IMHO). > >Is anyone volunteering for writing a book? > > >> I was worried about using koffice a while back sine I had heard about the >> format changing with 2.0 until I found the command line import/convert tool >> so I felt safe that I could simply convert everything over at one point >> with that tool. > >Yes, KOffice 2.0 is surely some distance off. To my knowledge it is not even >decided what the next version number will be. > >> I assume the templates will follow the OO standard as well, one >> thing I can't do easily in Kword at the moment is use a templae for an >> Avery label. I have to run open office for that. Any chance there will be >> command like file viewers/editors (I'm drifting way off the topic of the >> thread here so if someone wants to know why I'll start a new thread and >> explain). > >I think if you are missing some functionality then you should surely start >either a new thread for it or file in a wish item in the bug tracking system. > >> >> Eugene Nine >> >> >> >> ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >> From: David Faure >> Reply-To: For discussion about KOffice >> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:13:09 +0100 >> >> >On Thursday 29 January 2004 14:32, Eugene Nine wrote: >> >> I was looking at the koffice site and the developer.kde.org and I can't >> >> find anything on koffice 2.0? >> > >> >We have only just started the changes post 1.3. >> >The roadmap is yet to be decided upon, the only clear thing is the work on >> > the OOo file format. >> > >> >-- >> >David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE, >> >[...] >> [...] >____________________________________ >koffice mailing list >koffice@mail.kde.org >To unsubscribe please visit: >https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice > ________________________________________________________________ Sent via the HostPortal WebMail system at ninefamily.com ____________________________________ koffice mailing list koffice@mail.kde.org To unsubscribe please visit: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice