From koffice Mon Mar 24 20:44:26 2003 From: Ferdinand Gassauer Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:44:26 +0000 To: koffice Subject: Re: KOffice 1.3 alpha? X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice&m=104853876600506 David Faure wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sunday 23 March 2003 19:54, Ferdinand Gassauer wrote: >> Werner Trobin wrote: >> >> > On Sunday 23 March 2003 18:23, Vadim Plessky wrote: >> > >> > [...] >> > >> >> Is it possible to supply Word .doc and get back KWord's .kwd back? :-) >> > >> > For single documents: sure. For 1e5 documents: maybe not :-) >> > >> >> I hope file format in KWord 1.3 would be compatible with KWord 1.2, or >> >> at least it would be posisble to save docs in 1.2 format? >> > >> > I think so, yes. >> Unfortunately at least formating info is lost. see Davids comment on >> this. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56084 > > Of course the "new features" are lost when opening in the old application. > Here the main difference is the "display levels" attribute, which didn't > exist in 1.2. Or are you talking about something else? Well that's what I know for sure. > > (PS: your last comment to the BR doesn't make much sense to me. > If you don't update your version of KOffice, how will you get the > "backported" code you asked for? And if you do update, why not update to > 1.3 instead of 1.2.2?) Yes you are rigth - it just happens if someone is using CVS HEAD _and_ koffice 1.2.x > -- cu ferdinand ____________________________________ koffice mailing list koffice@mail.kde.org To unsubscribe please visit: http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice