[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice
Subject:    Re: Load times for Kword as compared to other WP
From:       David Faure <david () mandrakesoft ! com>
Date:       2002-05-31 7:26:58
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 31 May 2002 07:45, Thorsten Schnebeck wrote:
> Hmm, Jonathan: do you use Keramik? ;-)
> 
> So, no crash here on KOffice-HEAD (KDE-HEAD)
> 
> schnebeck@susi:~ > time kword Desktop/1dfre10.txt
> /usr/lib/qt3/plugins/imageformats/libqjpeg.so: Feature JPEG already defined in 
> /usr/lib/qt-copy/plugins/imageformats/libqjpeg.so!
> /usr/lib/qt3/plugins/imageformats/libqmng.so: Feature MNG already defined in 
> /usr/lib/qt-copy/plugins/imageformats/libqmng.so!
> 
> real    4m2.727s
> user    3m54.110s
> sys     0m1.830s
> schnebeck@susi:~ >
> (Athlon 1G)
> 
> Very interesting test. Koffice opens the text, asks about UFT stuff
> (I hit return) and after something like 25sec the whole text is loaded and you 
> can start to edit, to select, what ever.

Ah! That's what I wanted to hear. The loading takes 25s then, not 4 minutes ;)

> (file->Statistic needs "ages" ;-)

I was wondering if we should make the "readability score" not calculated
by default, only when pressing a button (in that dialog). The other counts
are rather fast to do, I would think.

> If you now want to close the doc, it looks like kword is frozen. But after 
> some minutes I'm back on konsole. NO crash!

Ok, so there's something going wrong on destruction. I'd still be interested
in the text file to test this, or preferrably in a gdb backtrace ;)

-- 
David FAURE, david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~david/
Contributing to: http://www.konqueror.org/, http://www.koffice.org/
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today


____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@mail.kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]