From koffice Thu May 30 15:53:22 2002 From: Thomas Zander Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 15:53:22 +0000 To: koffice Subject: Re: Load times for Kword as compared to other WP X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice&m=102277441402695 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 04:19:31PM +0200, Robert JACOLIN wrote: > Le Jeudi 30 Mai 2002 16:06, Jonathan Drews a ?crit : > > On Wednesday 29 May 2002 02:30, Robert JACOLIN wrote: > > > Very interesting. Perhaps It will be interresting to put on the web, > > > even is not in our advantage (is it an nglish word ?) ? > > > > Hello Bobby: > > > > Despite Kword's slow shut down times, the way it responds to editing > > a huge *.kwd doc is phenomenally fast. Whether you insert or move > > text, the 490 page *.kwd doc handled as fast as if it were only 3 > > pages. That, to me, is the most important thing. I scrolled the > > document up and down as quickly as I could and there was no delay at > > all. Please note: kword never crashed in any of these tests. There > > was a little delay in inserting headers. > > I did use a smaller 150 page document and all operations AFAICT were > > instantaneous. For this size *.kwd there was no delay at all in > > inserting headers or footers. > Ok. But kword take 5 min to load and staroffice 51 s It's just I see (I k= now=20 > kword will be a lot of speed up with the objprelink). I was a little quic= kly=20 > to study the result. But it stay interesting to put thisresults on the we= b=20 > site (with a little explanation like yours). While I have no problem with posting results on websites at all, I want to= =20 say I don't feel this is something that should be posted like a statement from the KOffice project. More like a post of KOffice users. I believe in the saying "we don't boast about our products we just make the= m" Cheers! --=20 Thomas Zander zander@planescape.c= om We are what we pretend to = be --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE89kryCojCW6H2z/QRAhiMAKDvaCPHdSoNDSLyX7+OS7VI92hW5wCg9FsY JXWxJxnfzTv5gofJpeIJXFw= =YAlj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1-- ____________________________________ koffice mailing list koffice@mail.kde.org To unsubscribe please visit: http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice