From koffice  Thu May 30 14:19:31 2002
From: Robert JACOLIN <rjacolin () ifrance ! com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 14:19:31 +0000
To: koffice
Subject: Re: Load times for Kword as compared to other WP
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice&m=102276847028295

Le Jeudi 30 Mai 2002 16:06, Jonathan Drews a écrit :
> On Wednesday 29 May 2002 02:30, Robert JACOLIN wrote:
> > Very interesting. Perhaps It will be interresting to put on the web,
> > even is not in our advantage (is it an nglish word ?) ?
>
> Hello Bobby:
>
>  Despite Kword's  slow shut down times,  the way it responds to editing
> a huge *.kwd doc is phenomenally fast.  Whether you insert or move
> text, the 490 page *.kwd doc handled as fast as if it were only 3
> pages. That, to me, is the most important thing. I scrolled the
> document up and down as quickly as I could and there was no delay at
> all. Please note:  kword never crashed in any of these tests.  There
> was a little delay in inserting headers.
>  I did use a smaller 150 page document and all operations AFAICT were
> instantaneous. For this size *.kwd there was no delay at all in
> inserting headers or footers.
Ok. But kword take 5 min to load and staroffice 51 s It's just I see (I know 
kword will be a lot of speed up with the objprelink). I was a little quickly 
to study the result. But it stay interesting to put thisresults on the web 
site (with a little explanation like yours).

:)))))))))))))))))
bobby
____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@mail.kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice