[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice
Subject:    Re: O.T. Spam
From:       Jost Schenck <jost.schenck () gmx ! de>
Date:       2002-05-28 11:07:42
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 28 May 2002 10:43, David Faure wrote:
> Well, I'm fine with changing koffice@ to members-only-can-post, but then
> you'll get even MORE admin work to do (accepting any post from users who
> found koffice@kde.org in the webpage).

I would do a test phase of a few days -- if the traffic is not bearable, I'll 
change it back again. Well, I'll just try and see.

> There's also a problem with bug
> reports for "koffice" (and koshell I think?). They arrive onto
> koffice@kde.org... would be very strange for bug reporters to get a "you
> message awaits for approval" in return ;) Maybe we should just send
> "Package: koffice" reports somewhere else then - to someone who could
> either re-assign if the bug is application-specific, or send to the
> appropriate developer if the problem is in the koffice libs. 

Why not send them to koffice-devel@kde.org and put the bug list user on the 
white list? Would this be possible?
-Jost.

____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@mail.kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]