[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Fwd: Re: Bug#31716 acknowledged by developer (KMail filters yield questionable results)
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <ingo.kloecker () epost ! de>
Date:       2001-08-30 21:58:26
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

No comment.

- ----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: Re: Bug#31716 acknowledged by developer (KMail filters yield 
questionable results)
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:08:11 -0500
From: CH <chamel007@earthlink.net>
To: Ingo Klöcker <ingo.kloecker@epost.de>

Just triple-checked the version, and you're correct.  Sorry 'bout
 that... :-\ <LOL>  I was in the kpackage & thought I saw a 2.2 in
 there!  Mercy!  So... I guess the bug is gonna feel like a yo-yo with
 being opened, closed, opened, closed...  Oh well.  Really sorry 'bout
 that!

Speaking of KDE... I d/l the files from sourceforge & there was no
kdesupport-2.2-1mdk.i586.rpm file in the mix.  I did a general search
 on your web-site & found nothing.  I used a search engine which has
 always been a good engine for Linux & *still* came up w/nothing --not
 to mention all the unsatisfied deps the thing shows.  I'd appreciate
 it if you could point me to a bit better installation instruction file
 than is presently on the site. :-)

Regards...
	...CH

On Wednesday 29 August 2001 16:52, you wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mittwoch, 29. August 2001 07:07, you wrote:
> > I just double-checked my KDE version# and it is 2.2-1.  The distro
> > is Mandrake.  I believe this is the version you said had the
> > filters reworked, isn't it...?
>
> Yes. But in your original bug report you stated:
> > Version: 1.2 (using KDE 2.1.2 )
> > Installed from:    Linux-Mandrake 8.0 i586
> > Compiler:          gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Linux-Mandrake 8.0
> > 2.96-0.48mdk)
> > OS:                Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686
>
> Therefore I thought you'd use an old version of KMail. I'll reopen
> the bug.
>
> Regards,
> Ingo
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE7jWQTGnR+RTDgudgRAha5AJwN6oMtaNnSnRBB5xZT7+DR/nnqZwCglAiZ
> mBBuBwwp4vgh3V7prlfPaUA=
> =AR7g
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

- -------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7jrcCGnR+RTDgudgRAnePAJ9y4/DkWW3VaYt96dEmTeZnexUv+gCbBHRX
gYhulhRPv6LkGi92cayw9lE=
=WRWz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Kmail Developers mailing list
Kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]