'Bug#31716: marked as done (KMail filters yield questionable results) by Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cke'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Bug#31716: marked as done (KMail filters yield questionable results) by Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cke
From:       owner () bugs ! kde ! org (Stephan Kulow)
Date:       2001-08-31 8:33:06
[Download RAW message or body]

Your message with subj: Fwd: Re: Bug#31716 acknowledged by developer (KMail filters \
yield questionable results)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

No comment.

- ----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: Re: Bug#31716 acknowledged by developer (KMail filters yield 
questionable results)
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:08:11 -0500
From: CH <chamel007@earthlink.net>
To: Ingo Klöcker <ingo.kloecker@epost.de>

Just triple-checked the version, and you're correct.  Sorry 'bout
 that... :-\ <LOL>  I was in the kpackage & thought I saw a 2.2 in
 there!  Mercy!  So... I guess the bug is gonna feel like a yo-yo with
 being opened, closed, opened, closed...  Oh well.  Really sorry 'bout
 that!

Speaking of KDE... I d/l the files from sourceforge & there was no
kdesupport-2.2-1mdk.i586.rpm file in the mix.  I did a general search
 on your web-site & found nothing.  I used a search engine which has
 always been a good engine for Linux & *still* came up w/nothing --not
 to mention all the unsatisfied deps the thing shows.  I'd appreciate
 it if you could point me to a bit better installation instruction file
 than is presently on the site. :-)

Regards...
	...CH

On Wednesday 29 August 2001 16:52, you wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Mittwoch, 29. August 2001 07:07, you wrote:
> > I just double-checked my KDE version# and it is 2.2-1.  The distro
> > is Mandrake.  I believe this is the version you said had the
> > filters reworked, isn't it...?
> 
> Yes. But in your original bug report you stated:
> > Version: 1.2 (using KDE 2.1.2 )
> > Installed from:    Linux-Mandrake 8.0 i586
> > Compiler:          gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Linux-Mandrake 8.0
> > 2.96-0.48mdk)
> > OS:                Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686
> 
> Therefore I thought you'd use an old version of KMail. I'll reopen
> the bug.
> 
> Regards,
> Ingo
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
> 
> iD8DBQE7jWQTGnR+RTDgudgRAha5AJwN6oMtaNnSnRBB5xZT7+DR/nnqZwCglAiZ
> mBBuBwwp4vgh3V7prlfPaUA=
> =AR7g
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

- -------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7jrcCGnR+RTDgudgRAnePAJ9y4/DkWW3VaYt96dEmTeZnexUv+gCbBHRX
gYhulhRPv6LkGi92cayw9lE=
=WRWz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Stephan Kulow
(administrator, KDE bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.kde.org; 28 Aug 2001 13:52:51 +0000
Received: (qmail 22152 invoked by uid 33); 28 Aug 2001 13:52:51 -0000
Date: 28 Aug 2001 13:52:51 -0000
Message-ID: <20010828135251.22151.qmail@master.kde.org>
To: submit@bugs.kde.org
Subject: KMail filters yield questionable results
From: CHamel@prodigy.net

Package:           kmail
Version:           1.2 (using KDE 2.1.2 )
Severity:          normal
Installed from:    Linux-Mandrake 8.0 i586
Compiler:          gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Linux-Mandrake 8.0 2.96-0.48mdk)
OS:                Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686
OS/Compiler notes:

I have two rules in the 'Filters' section which usually filter out HTML pages since I \
do not have that capability enabled (If KMAIL does it at all).  They are:

if <body> comtains <p> move to Trash
if <body> contains <FONT move to Trash

The problem lies in the fact that some messages w/o either of those two words in them \
are moved to Trash, and there is no rule which should or would cause that to happen.  \
The worst part is that this behaviour is inconsistent, message for message.

(Submitted via bugs.kde.org)
(Called from KBugReport dialog)

_______________________________________________
Kmail Developers mailing list
Kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 