From kmail-devel Mon Apr 30 19:10:29 2001 From: Andreas Gungl Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 19:10:29 +0000 To: kmail-devel Subject: Re: Forwarding encrypted messages (was: Re: PATCH: reply to signed messages) X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kmail-devel&m=98868978331283 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 29 April 2001 12:50, Ingo Kl=F6cker wrote: > On Saturday, 28. April 2001 21:25, Andreas Gungl wrote: > > Well, I think we agree at least concerning the reply to messages. > > Encrypted or signed messages should be treated like text only > > messages there. > > Agree. > > [...] > > Conclusion: > IMHO encrypted mails shouldn't be decrypted automatically in order to > forward them. Just want to let you know I'm working on a solution for this (having stil= l=20 some trouble with signed messages, encrypted ones behave okay for reply a= nd=20 forward). But this is without GUI stuff like below, maybe someone wants t= o=20 add it later when I have finished the backgroud (or I'll add it too). I'll send a patch to the list when I think I'm ready. > In order to anticipate some "bug reports" like "If I forward an > encrypted mail it isn't decrypted automatically." maybe a dialog box > should pop up if the user tries to forward an encrypted mail which > tells him: > 1.) that he tries to forward a mail which contains encrypted informatio= n > 2.) that explains why we consider this a bad idea and therefore don't > automatically decrypt the mail > 3.) and that advices him to ask the original sender for consent or to > ask the original sender to forward the mail himself. Andreas - --=20 ~ ' v ' // \\ /( )\ Powered by Penguin. ^ ' ^ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE67bilVhjiFd4beU8RAhWfAJ4xaAojGioat6HNkclPwZEorwyRoACg5HHi V5ROwvFqa8CPRUVU+0LLZFg=3D =3DbEpj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Kmail Developers mailing list Kmail@master.kde.org http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail