On Monday 30 April 2001 19:21, Don Sanders wrote:
> On Monday 30 April 2001 11:47, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > On Sunday, 29. April 2001 22:39, Don Sanders wrote:
> > > I believe enabling/disabling of (not yet created?) toolbar buttons =
is
> > > less important than fixing the memory leak.
> >
> > I commit a patch to folderToPopup and now there is no updateMessageMe=
nu
> > in a call path to a leaking instruction.
>
> I have updated kmmainwin.cpp and kmmainwin.h and the leak in
> updateMessageMenu is still present. (Just add a return at the start of
> updateMessageMenu and use the method I outlined in an earlier mail to
> confirm this).

Can confirm this.

> There is a small memory leak in khtml (or at least kmreaderwin) as well=
 but
> it's very minor compared to the updateMessageMenu leak.

So as this. It is for sure not related to KHTML when I press Right mouse=20
button, again, and again, and memory leaks.

> > And if Dennis said it leaks if he goes to a larger message, this
> > indicates even more that it's not related to updateMessageMenu as thi=
s
> > code has no relation to the size of a message. Either it leaks always=
 the
> > same amount or it doesn't leak. The leak you and Dennis see is either=
 in
> > khtml or in kmail's use of khtml.
>
> No. It's just that large messages require more memory to display than
> smaller messages and once memory has been allocated by an application o=
n
> linux (and all unixes?) it is not given back to the operating system.
>
> BFN,
> Don.
> _______________________________________________
> Kmail Developers mailing list
> Kmail@master.kde.org
> http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

--=20
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine

----------------------------------
E-Mail: dyp@perchine.com
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
----------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Kmail Developers mailing list
Kmail@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail