On Saturday 28 April 2001 22:58, Stefan Taferner wrote: > My original implementation had this by default and it was changed because > it seemed to confuse users. > > No offense, but IMO this is a shortcoming now that you cannot make minor > filter rules that do not stop filtering. Oh, you are right. Actually I didn't realize I broke that. I'm quite surprised! > Maybe add an option to not stop filtering at a matching rule? Sounds good, (but I work on other things now). BFN, Don. _______________________________________________ Kmail Developers mailing list Kmail@master.kde.org http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail