[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Filter question and praise
From:       John Aldrich <john () chattanooga ! net>
Date:       2001-04-29 14:58:14
[Download RAW message or body]

On Saturday 28 April 2001 04:58 pm, Stefan Taferner wrote:
>
> Maybe add an option to not stop filtering at a matching rule?
>
YES! That would be nice!
>
> My original implementation had this by default and it was changed because
> it seemed to confuse users.
>
> No offense, but IMO this is a shortcoming now that you cannot make minor
> filter rules that do not stop filtering.
>
Stefan...I really wish I knew how to program so I could do more than 
contribute my thoughts/wishes. :-) This is a GREAT idea... I could, I 
suppose, include multiple actions in one filter, but that wouldn't catch 'em 
all... :-(
I think you're correct in that it needs to have another "keep looking for 
more filters" action or something... maybe have a way to "pair" filters so 
that you can do multiple things to an email by combining multiple filters, 
something along the lines of "include filter #23" and "include filter #5" 
etc. so that you get multiple actions. I'm not sure how this would work, but 
I think you probably get my idea...

Back to lurk mode. :-)
	John
_______________________________________________
Kmail Developers mailing list
Kmail@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]