[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kmail-devel
Subject: Re: Filter question and praise
From: John Aldrich <john () chattanooga ! net>
Date: 2001-04-29 14:58:14
[Download RAW message or body]
On Saturday 28 April 2001 04:58 pm, Stefan Taferner wrote:
>
> Maybe add an option to not stop filtering at a matching rule?
>
YES! That would be nice!
>
> My original implementation had this by default and it was changed because
> it seemed to confuse users.
>
> No offense, but IMO this is a shortcoming now that you cannot make minor
> filter rules that do not stop filtering.
>
Stefan...I really wish I knew how to program so I could do more than
contribute my thoughts/wishes. :-) This is a GREAT idea... I could, I
suppose, include multiple actions in one filter, but that wouldn't catch 'em
all... :-(
I think you're correct in that it needs to have another "keep looking for
more filters" action or something... maybe have a way to "pair" filters so
that you can do multiple things to an email by combining multiple filters,
something along the lines of "include filter #23" and "include filter #5"
etc. so that you get multiple actions. I'm not sure how this would work, but
I think you probably get my idea...
Back to lurk mode. :-)
John
_______________________________________________
Kmail Developers mailing list
Kmail@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic